It's a Part of the British Way of LIfe

Yeah right, like Morris Dancing, Fish n Chips and Black Pudding!

Well, we certainly have gained some lovely new British Traditions, Honour Killings, Female Mutilations, Rickets, Inbred Children, Rape within Marriage and not forgetting that great British Tradition "the Veil".

What complete and utter rot!

It would be like me suggesting to one of my Spanish friends that "el Bingo" was now a way of Spanish Life... I wouldn't have the audacity or bad manners to do so.

No such thing as rape in marriage.

A senior Muslim cleric who runs the country's largest network of sharia courts has sparked controversy by claiming that there is no such thing as rape within marriage.

Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed, president of the Islamic Sharia Council in Britain, said that men who rape their wives should not be prosecuted because "sex is part of marriage". And he claimed that many married women who alleged rape were lying.

"In Islamic sharia, rape is adultery by force. So long as the woman is his wife, it cannot be termed as rape. It is reprehensible, but we do not call it rape."

Source

In it's efforts to appease Islam (Dhimmitude), the British Government is forgetting one thing. It is neglecting to protect Muslim women and girls. The longer this is allowed to continue, the more they will suffer as a result.

Other countries in Europe have made a concerted effort to ensure that the human rights of these women are protected and I am appalled that the UK (under the guise of freedom), is still allowing Sharia Courts to operate.

This only proves that Sharia is clearly in conflict with EU and UK laws and should be banned.

Equality for all but Muslim Girls it seems

Why bring the equalities act into force when Islamic Schools are allowed to make wearing the Islamic Veil compulsory as part of the girls school uniform (walking to and from school?)

Why aren't we protecting these girls in the UK?

France and Holland have banned the stupid garment altogether.

What is the matter with our government? Are they now so far up their own arses they'll do anything to appease the extremist male muslims?

The suffragettes will be turning in their graves.

SHAME ON YOU CAMERON!

FYI

Muslim countries such as Turkey, Egypt, Tunisia and Syria have banned the wearing of burkhas in schools and universities – and they did this with little fuss and widespread public support.

The governments of these Muslim countries, have long attacked the burkha as an outward symbol of religious fervour, with most people against the sight of veiled women on their streets.

In Turkey and Syria, a country dubbed part of the Islamic “axis of evil” by George Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war, the burkha is considered a dangerous threat to secular values. Women who choose to wear it are often frowned upon by society.

The government in Jordan has tried to discourage veils by playing up reports of robbers using them to hide their faces.

Source

It was inevitable wasn't it?

Airport Body Scanners Violate the Teachings of Islam, Says Muslim Group

"It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women," FCNA explained. The group noted that Islam emphasizes modesty, considering it part of the faith. "The Qur'an has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts" and to be modest in their dress.

While exceptions can be made in cases of "extreme necessity," FCNA indicated that passenger body scans do not rise to that level.

FCNA is asking for changes in scanner software so the machines will produce only body outlines. In the meantime, the group says Muslim travelers should choose pat-down searches over scanner images – in cases where searches are necessary.

The Fiqh Council of North America is an affiliate of the Islamic Society of North America, which advises and educates its members and officials “on matters related to the application of Shari’ah (Islamic law) in their individual and collective lives in the North American environment.”

Didn't anyone think to ask whether this whole body scanner fiasco might violate Islamic Laws? The scanners are aimed at terrorists and 99% of them are Muslim! Does that mean the rest of us have to go through the humiliation and the people who this whole idea was put in place for, get away with it?

Some people deserve their comeuppance.

"An Arab ambassador said he decided to call off his wedding immediately after he discovered that his wife-to-be, who wears a niqab, was bearded and cross-eyed.

The ambassador claimed that the bride's mother deceived his mother, when she went to see his Gulf national wife-to-be, by showing her pictures of the bride's sister.

The Arab man, who also holds the title of minister plenipotentiary, claimed to a Sharia court judge in Dubai that the bride's family showed his mother photos of the bride's sister and not the woman he was going to marry.

Sources close to the case told Gulf News that the groom only saw the woman a few times. He did not realise that she had a beard because she wore the niqab the few times he met her, added the source.

"Every time the couple met, the bride would do her best not to reveal her entire face. After the ambassador and the woman, who is a physician, signed the marriage contract, the groom was sitting with the bride… he claimed to the Sharia court officials that when he wanted to kiss his wife-to-be, he discovered that she was bearded and cross-eyed as well," claimed the source.

The ambassador then decided to call off the wedding party and lodged a divorce claim alleging that he was tricked by his parents-in-law and incurred emotional and moral damage.

In his lawsuit, the groom also asked the bride to repay him his Dh500,000, the amount which he claimed he spent on jewellery, clothes and gifts.

During the trial, the bride asked the judge to dismiss the groom's lawsuit and demanded him to pay her alimony after the Arab called off the wedding party.

Gulf News also learnt that the ambassador requested the Sharia court to refer the Gulf national woman to a specialist to have her examined for hormonal deficiencies. The court referred the bride to a specialist who countered the ambassador's claims and reported that she did not suffer any hormonal problems.

The court divorced the couple and rejected the groom's request that the pre-marriage gifts be returned".

UKIP and the Burkha Ban

I am even more pleased now that I have decided to vote UKIP having heard yesterday that they plan to ban the burka in public places. The MSM and blogosphere are as usual deeply divided, those against the move citing the "freedom to choose" rhetoric.

Firstly, the burkha and hijab are an affront to women. We have absolutely no idea how many girls or women are being forced to wear this garment against their will. The sensible thing to do is ban it to protect those that are probably living a life of purgatory with their "menfolk".

Secondly, the security of our country is threatened when people cannot be readily identified. What's the point of all the CCTV camera's if you can't see someones face? Why is it that some people are stopped from wearing hoodies in shopping centres and yet those in the "travelling tent" are allowed in?

Thirdly, it is culturally uncomfortable for the West not to be able to read someones face. What do the hearing impaired who rely on lip reading do? Completely ignore those in the garb? Infact, I would go so far as to say that it's downright bloody ill mannered not to see someone's face if you are conversing with them.

Fourth, they have been used in crimes.

Fifth, they are being worn not for religious reasons, the people that wear them look down on the decadent West. They are a way to culturally separate themselves from us. They are a political/moral statement!

Sixth, How can those who wear these garment scream about freedom of choice when they themselves advocate their "non democratic" tenets of Sharia and would like to impose them on all of us against our will or be executed?

Lastly, the freedom of choice issue. Were the British public given the freedom to choose whether we open our doors to so many people from the third world and developing countries?

NO, we were not asked! So much for OUR "freedom of choice" and if I didn't get mine, why the fuck should you get yours?

I, for one, am happy to welcome productive people from anywhere in the world who want to integrate and help build

a healthy society for our children and grandchildren to thrive in. I do not however welcome those that come over simply to abuse our hospitality and then piss on our customs and traditions! Those people will no doubt be more comfortable in a country that caters completely for their particular level of discipline to their "faith".....

Life in the UK and in much of Europe has been completely altered to appease this particular faith/political system, sometimes at the cost of our freedoms which have taken centuries to win. The Suffragettes for example suffered terribly in order for women to be treated equally and my freedom to call someone a "Paki" has been denied me (strange how it doesn't work the other way around!).

It seems totally hypocritical for these people who have been instrumental in denying so many of us our freedom of speech and freedom to choose, to complain about something that quite honestly has no place in a civilised Western country that has respect for women and upholds the traditions and customs of that countries culture.